<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Shark deterrent technology - Facts vs. Fiction</title>
		<description>Discuss Shark deterrent technology - Facts vs. Fiction</description>
		<link>http://www.surfnewsnetwork.com/archive/shark-deterrent-technology-facts-vs-fiction</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:25:05 --1000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.surfnewsnetwork.com/feed/com_content/896/page-1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Chris Larson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.surfnewsnetwork.com/archive/shark-deterrent-technology-facts-vs-fiction#comment-488</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What about Samarium? How about putting 1/4 pound of Samarium powder in the glass coat on the underside of surfboards? Then seal it with the gloss coat. http://www.theworld.org/2012/04/repel-sharks/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samarium]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Chris Larson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 11:58:13 --1000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.surfnewsnetwork.com/archive/shark-deterrent-technology-facts-vs-fiction#comment-488</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
